Archive for July, 2018
Key Members of the Health and Human Services Committees sign letter to support Midwest Association for Medical Equipment Services (MAMES) Petition to Force Incontinence Program Rulemaking
Sheri Melander-Smith, Ms. Wheelchair America, files official protest against the Minnesota Department of Human Services’ plan to award a distributor a monopoly for medically-necessary incontinence products
Ms. Melander-Smith joins a growing coalition of legislators, advocates, providers, caregivers, and patients working to prevent the award of the Department of Human Services’ (DHS’s) monopoly Preferred Incontinence Product Program procurement
(SAINT PAUL, MN) – Ms. Wheelchair America, Sheri Melander-Smith of Chanhassen, Minnesota, today filed an official protest against DHS’s Preferred Incontinence Product Program (PIPP), which would award a single company a monopoly on distributing medically-necessary incontinence products to Minnesota Medicaid patients. The PIPP is opposed by disability advocates, providers, legislative leaders in both parties, and Governor Dayton.
“If DHS succeeds in giving a single corporation a monopoly, the health and dignity of Minnesota’s most vulnerable citizens will be put at risk. Patients will have reduced access to high-quality incontinence products, while costs will likely go up,” said Melander-Smith. “I’m proud to join with the disability community in the fight against this unnecessary and dangerous program that puts patients at risk.”
The PIPP would designate a single monopoly distributor of medically-necessary incontinence products to Minnesota Medicaid patients. Ms. Melander-Smith’s protest further details the potential harm of the program to the disability community, including Minnesotans like her.
Ms. Melander-Smith also signed onto a legal petition requesting that DHS initiate an official rulemaking process before the Office of Administrative Hearings. A bipartisan group of 10 Minnesota legislators recently signed a letter of support for the petition. The petition was filed with an Administrative Law Judge, who has 30 days to respond and determine whether to require a formal rulemaking process. Read more
Recent comments: